Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manca Marcelan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 17:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manca Marcelan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources available for the subject on the web. ToT89 (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: her club website looks reliable enough and is good enough for Slovenian wikipedia. She seems to have been national champion in several competitions, so being notable. PamD 08:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article needs work but she is notable per PamD. W C M_email 10:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: While it definitely needs expansion and outside sources (Perhaps from someone who can read Slovenian), She does seem notable enough as she has been named athlete of the year in her homecountry and seems to have quite some success. Zombles (talk) 12:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added a couple of references, and there are more online that verify other wins, etc. I don't know what the nominator means by "no reliable sources" - is Slovenia's national public broadcaster not reliable? or the Slovenian Press Agency? Slovenian newspapers? RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.