Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MG Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was reverted and renamed to Makedonski Glas by Rich Farmbrough. The redirect was speedily deleted by Peridon. Non-admin housekeeping closure.--xanchester (t) 23:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MG Services

Note: renamed to Makedonski Glas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity, not notable, local two-person company that is less than 10 years old. http://www.mgservicesonline.com/index.php/about-us pretty much sums it up ColtsScore (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also appears this article was subject of debate before and was turned down in Article for Creation discussion.ColtsScore (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revert/rename to original Makedonski Glas article per GoingBatty below. Delete No claim or evidence of notability. Could go as a CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing here to establish notability and no coverage in reliable / verifiable sources. It's remarkable that this article hung around for more than four years, but there appears to be nothing to add to improve the article to establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revert - If you look at the history of this article, it used to be called Makedonski Glas. On January 8, 2012, User:Sekigor changed the article from Makedonski Glas (a Macedonian newspaper) to MG Services (a non-notable insurance company). My suggestion is to revert this vandalism and all edits since then and restore the Makedonski Glas article title. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ah, indeed, well spotted. It is hard to assume good faith in such an overwrite and rename, and it should be reversed asap to return to the former article with its edit history. (The article on the Macedonian newspaper is/was unreferenced and may be open to notability challenge itself, but that is for another day.) Were it not for this AfD, the reinstatement could proceed through normal editing; I'm not sure whether it has to wait or can be closed resolutely earlier than normal? AllyD (talk) 08:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would have boldly made the change myself, but I think we'll need help from an admin to undo the page move. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not the first time an article is renamed without rhyme or reason . Unfortunately, the deletions at Wikipedia help hide this phenomenon. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revert and rename per GoingBatty. The article was hijacked and moved. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revert and rename I withdraw my request to delete ColtsScore (talk) 02:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revert and rename per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted and renamed The previous article, however, was created by the same editor, and may also be non-notable. I have therefore re-added the link to this AfD, although if someone wished to close this one and start a fresh one, that would be fine. Rich Farmbrough, 18:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.