Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Måltid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Samla Mammas Manna. ✗plicit 14:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Måltid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUM. It has been redirected to the band multiple times, but was reverted on the grounds that "according to WP:NALBUM AllMusic is considered reliable", which is untrue. The guideline does say, however, that "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", which is the outcome I am requesting. – bradv 13:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~: Seeing nothing aside from AllMusic. Same goes for the band so I also started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samla Mammas Manna. If that ends up kept then redirect this there instead. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Julle's work, this already looks far more promising. This could turn into a WP:HEY if someone had access to those older newspapers mentioned below. And given the same work done for the band article, that's certain to stay now. Redirect for now until more coverage is located. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 19:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Pretty certain this would easily pass if we had proper access to non-digitized sources. For example, it's one of the pieces of Swedish culture which w:sv:Tusen svenska klassiker ranks as one of the "1 000 Swedish books, films, albums and television shows from 1956 to 2009" the authors considers to be classics; this particular entry written by w:sv:Jan Gradvall. It's mentioned in the newspaper archive I've got access to (w:sv:Mediearkivet), but all the proper reviews are of course fifty years old and not digitized. /Julle (talk) 17:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note that references do not have to be available on line. If you have legitimate references, you can feel free to add them even if they are only available in paper form in libraries or archives. Klausness (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect. Band is clearly notable. Keep if album meets criteria in WP:NALBUM (and it sounds like it probably does), otherwise redirect to band page. Klausness (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.