Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusíada University
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Lusíada University[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lusíada University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell this article has only been referenced to a single source since it's creation in 2004 and the source doesn't even have anything to do with the place. Also when I did a WP:BEFORE all I could find was a few trivial name drops in articles about other things and a few school directories. Nothing that would constitute significant, in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources though. So I'm nominating the article for deletion. Adamant1 (talk) 07:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Many hits in GScholar about people working there that publish, nothing much on the institution itself. Oaktree b (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.