Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucinda Collins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, thanks to some fast work on sources. Guy (Help!) 14:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lucinda Collins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sourced statements in this article are tagged as failing verification. That's a bit of a problem. Academic musicians will often not get anything like the attention more active performers do (I know: I have struggled to source articles on very well known academics). Guy (Help!) 08:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have worked on some refs, I have added content and refs, some tidying up. The subject is notable per WP:MUSICBIO.–shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Shaidar cuebiyar. I also found a small mention of her skills as a pianist in The Age for her performance with a famous violinist which I added. She passes MUSICBIO. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: now seems well sourced and notable. PamD 12:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.