Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Cappiello
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lorenzo Cappiello, Non è un mistero (Lorenzo Cappiello (EP), Non è un mistero, Lorenzo (CD), No es ningún misterio[edit]
- Lorenzo Cappiello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Vanity, no google references aside from the blog and the information listed on the pages is questionable. --fvw* 16:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Google.it brings up a fair number of Lorenzo Cappiello hits, but they don't seem to be relevant. If the songs were going Gold and Platinum over the past year, they'd be mentioned online.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Uncited, no Google references. Numerous removals of the AfD template on the page indicate a non-cooperative author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment All citations added by the author to Non è un mistero have failed verification. Nineteen failed verifications constitutes vandalism, to my thinking. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a known vandal on it.wiki. He got an infinite block for nonsense contribution, he created only hoaxes and multiple sockpuppets. The entries reported here are all blocked because of repeated creation. Here is the link to the discussion, and here his known SP. Just to clear the whole situation. Thanks, --Gliu 20:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment All citations added by the author to Non è un mistero have failed verification. Nineteen failed verifications constitutes vandalism, to my thinking. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.