Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Betty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:55, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Betty[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Related to this AfD. I can't find any coverage in secondary reliable sources to demonstrate that this film is notable. The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, readding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that the IP may be a sockpuppet), bringing to light that every other film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 20:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: These six AfDs are also related.

That's all of them so far. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 21:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and send to cleanup to remove promotional tone. A pity that the article author is adding stuff for non-notable films, and he sure could use some schooling in MOS, but since it has won some awards, at least London Betty seems to be pushing toward meeting WP:NF [1], [2], [3]. ~~Might be worth considering a merge to the article on the Bikini Bloodbath series.~~ Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ascidian | talk-to-me 17:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This AfD was not listed on a log page so I have re-listed it. ascidian | talk-to-me 17:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per MichaelQSchmidt. It appears to have some pedigree and a few recognizable B-list actors. Warrah (talk) 19:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Schmidt. Joe Chill (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been cleaned up. Now time to source the awards and accolades. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.