Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd 2: Growing Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by DESiegel as a blatant hoax (G3).(non-admin closure) Altamel (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd 2: Growing Up

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was endorsing the PROD but RHaworth PRODed this in May 2010 and but there's simply nothing good much less for improvement and notability (the IMDb link shown in the history simply takes you to the first film. Also pinging past users RadioFan, MarnetteD and TheGGoose. SwisterTwister talk 17:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This should be a hoax upon looking up this film's name with quotations on Google; the results are fake-ish and aren't valuable. It's worth noting that in the talk page an IP user called the film a hoax, but unfortunately the message didn't spread. TheGGoose (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no sign of this purported sequel film in reliable sources, nor is it listed (or even mentioned) on IMDb at either the page for the original film (where you'd expect to see a "Movie Connections" link, at least) or at Todd Bosley's page, even though he's the supposed star of the purported sequel. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Films-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to the topic not being verifiable and likely a hoax. Erik II (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be a clear hoax. In addition to points previously made, the alleged Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings do not exist. Calamondin12 (talk) 23:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note. This article was originally created on 6 May 2010; as an apparent hoax that has lasted in article space for more than 5 years, its next (and final) stop should be the archive described in the section entitled "Suggestions to administrators on archiving hoaxes" at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as even if there might have been rumors about a Lloyd sequel, nothing has ever materialized. At the kindest this fails WP:NFF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.