Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Pirates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Parodius (series). Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little Pirates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. It's been speedied (and denied because its a software product not eligible for speedy). It's been prodded (and that was removed by the author without explanation). So let's try AFD. Really, this is just another brand of Japanese slot machine. No indications of notability in the article or to be found elsewhere. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Parodius (series) until such time as sufficient RS exist to justify its own article. TomPointTwo (talk) 22:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Parodius (series). Its already mentioned there, and there really isn't much information here worth saving. There's really not much information on this particular pachislot, as far as reliable sources go, so I don't see this ever being notable enough to have its own article. Rorshacma (talk) 17:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete. I found no worthwhile coverage from reliable sources, just this WP article and its derivatives, sales sites, directory entries, and stray mentions. Very new article, so I'm not even sure a redirect is in order. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.