Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of three letter English words
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No encyclopaedic information, unsourced. (Oh, and it won't be used by Scrabble players who will use Official Scrabble Words :-) ). Delete. BlueValour 17:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per not being encyclopedic and WP:LC. --Nishkid64 17:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Nishkid. Hello32020 17:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam User:Yy-bo 18:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per 1st vote. Tracker/TTV (myTalk|myWork|myInbox) 19:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just a lot of external links. No context, indiscriminate. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary or delete. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 23:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Transwiki to Wiktionary. Although I created this article, it was at the request of and to help User:WillMak050389 who was the one that suggested it and supplied the data for it. I was pretty new here at the time... I did some simple regexp transformations and created the article. I now agree that it's not really encyclopedic and belongs in a better home (for it). Brian 03:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]
- Transwiki to Wictionary Doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, but it does fit in well over there. EVula 04:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article was created on accident, the text was supposed to be pasted into List of three-letter English words, but instead a new article was created. I say merge these two. --WillMak050389 20:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps we should just merge the two then. Brian 18:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]
- Delete since the List of three-letter English words remains, but if the editors there want to preserve that list from deletion, they should seriously consider making it look more encyclopedic along the lines of List_of_two-letter_English_words. Carlossuarez46 18:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.