Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Saguenay, Quebec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Saguenay, Quebec

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know that there is no definite line drawn as to when "List of tallest buildings in ___" become notable or not notable. I would say, however, that wherever we draw that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons:

Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article.
Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Database listings in Skyscraperpage and Emporis do not constitute significant coverage.
I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Saguenay' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources but I am happy to be proved wrong here.
No high-rise buildings under construction or even planned currently so little chance of future notability; no point in sending to draft
The whole article is currently a violation of WP:NOTMIRROR as it is a copy and paste from Skyscraperpage
The city is only the fifth largest in Quebec and isn't the capital so no reason for an article to exist on its not-very-tall buildings

Similar AfDs for reference: Bradenton and Macon

Spiderone 08:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - was previously up for AfD as part of a massive grouping and kept Spiderone 08:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete Well, this is going to be another case of a do-over of a mass delete to get rid of a lot of make-work one by one instead of all at once. The problem is the same: a list of run-of-the-mill buildings, none of which are particularly tall. And it needs to be said that this article would need to be constantly updated from skyscraperpage.com (the only source) every time a new building goes up in this city—assuming that they even are a reliable source, as I would not be surprised to learn that they are crowd-sourced too. Mangoe (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This doesn't seem notable as a subject outside of a single website, which it seems to be a mirror of, and Wikipedia isn't a directory. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, there is nothing there that can assist in navigation. // Timothy :: talk 14:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.