Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Jamshedpur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Jamshedpur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:LISTN. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons. Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article. Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. The only thing I found when doing a WP:BEFORE search was Skyscraper City, which is a deprecated source. Thirdly, I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Jamshedpur' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources Spiderone 15:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings on the list are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, it does not assist in navigation, and does not serve any purpose under WP:AOAL. // Timothy :: talk 14:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - this list technically meets my standards. I am willing to re-consider. Bearian (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.