Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of opinions from the Federal Reporter, Third Series, volume 120
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was ''Nom closure (non-admin closure) This article is just a tiny portion of the series. See the above AfDs. Leonard(Bloom) 18:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of opinions from the Federal Reporter, Third Series, volume 120 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:NOT (WP:IINFO). I don't see why this page was needed in the first place. Leonard(Bloom) 02:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not an index for government periodicals, periodicals of any other kind, et cetera. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 06:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It seems a bit pointless to AFD this list one at a time. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 08:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'll put the whole thing up on AfD. Thanks for the notice; that's incredible. Leonard(Bloom) 18:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.