Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gangs active in the midwest United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. List certainly appears to be redundant. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of gangs active in the midwest United States[edit]
- List of gangs active in the midwest United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DELETE. Not only is this mostly redundant with List of gangs in the United States, the majority of what is listed here is either unsourced or patently false. :-( Kill it with fire. JBsupreme (talk) 08:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Rather pointless - redundant to the other list article mentioned above. It doesn't warrant its own article. Aiken ♫ 09:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Poorly written article, starting with no clue about what the author's definition of the Midwest United States includes. Chicago is usually considered the major city of the Midwest, but I've seen it extended into Nebraska, Minnesota and even Kentucky, which is about as midwest as a bowl of grits. Even at that, do we really need indiscriminate lists of gangs active in vaguely defined areas like "the Deep South", "around New England", or "the Southwest"? Gangs of the U.S. doesn't need spinoffs. Mandsford (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Mandsford. -- Dspradau → talk 16:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.