Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels owned by Disney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Disney–ABC Television Group. postdlf (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of channels owned by Disney[edit]

List of channels owned by Disney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a mess, with arbitary classifications based on demographics and tons of edit warring by obsessed IP editors. It's also redundant, as all Disney-owned television networks are divisions of the Disney–ABC Television Group, whose article already contains similar content organized in a more informative manner. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No reason to keep this list around. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 22:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator re:redundant. Plus there are some that are made up like ABC News+ and Eyewitness News Channel and this list seem to out of way, ie. disconnected, and thus a target of disruptive editors that make up stuff. This just makes more work for editors. Spshu (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect into Disney–ABC_Television_Group, the title is a likely search query, and there's already a list of channels at the Disney ABC Group page.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and then Redirect if needed to ensure this is not simply restored and to show there's still nothing for its own convincing article. SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Prisencolin. Plausible search temr on which we have a relevant page. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.