Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of all Patrouille Suisse Pilots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of all Patrouille Suisse Pilots[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic fails WP:LISTN and none of its entries appear to be individually notable people. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. Certainly fails WP:LISTN. Just a list of non notable people. Ajf773 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator: this kind of article isn't in line with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria as nominal rolls and the like are not useful encyclopedic content. Nick-D (talk) 23:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a list on not-notable persons doesnt add any value to wikipedia. MilborneOne (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:LISTN. Almost everyone listed isn't notable....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. As stated above it fails, WP:LISTN as to notability. Kierzek (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.