Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NSW Central Coast cricket club season averages 1900-54

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Userfication can be requested at WP:REFUND or elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of NSW Central Coast cricket club season averages 1900-54[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST. Störm (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is WP:NOTSTATS, that's all this appears to be. Seasider91 (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This just seems to be something that you would put up as random stats which isn't really needed here. As this fails WP:NOTSTATS HawkAussie (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 05:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTSTATS and appears to be below Australian grade cricket level. Ajf773 (talk) 10:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. StickyWicket (talk) 14:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Teraplane (talk) 00:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I agree this list is not suitable for Wikipedia but the creator appears to have put a lot of time, effort and meticulous research into it. However, they have not edited in a month and may very well come back to find all their hard work gone with no way of retrieving it. To avoid losing the list before it can be transferred to a suitable alternative outlet, perhaps it can be moved into either my or Nhoj1898's userspace for a few months instead of immediate deletion? – Teratix ₵ 05:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - although not suitable for Wikipedia, agree with userfying the list for say 6 months to allow the user to put it elsewhere. Bookscale (talk) 01:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Delete per nom.Forest90 (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]