Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NCAA March Madness commentary crews for CBS/TNT Sports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Surprised to see a consensus to Keep this article as most of the other articles on sports broadcasting for events that have been brought to AFD have resulted in Deletions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of NCAA March Madness commentary crews for CBS/TNT Sports[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS, most of these are WP:PRIMARY. Of the three remaining sources two of them is dead and one is nothing but listings and announcments, doing nothing to establish notability. SpacedFarmer (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Television, and Basketball. SpacedFarmer (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: These crews get covered as a group in secondary sources such as [[1]], [[2]], [[3]] [[4]] and [[5]] (not to mention that these sources were just on the first page of results of a quick internet search). I'd say it passes the WP:LISTN criteria and I'm not sure what part of WP:NOTDATABASE the nom thinks this violates (or WP:NOTTVGUIDE, since this isn't covering a broadcast schedule). The current sources are mostly primary, but that is not a reason to delete any article on its own when secondary sources are shown to exist. Let'srun (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources found by Let'srun. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I figured when we get up to the most notable sporting events in the US that we would get more WP:SIGCOV. The article does need to be trimmed, but the sources provided by Let'srun suffice for WP:LISTN. Conyo14 (talk) 05:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.