Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBA Western Conference Final broadcasters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of NBA Western Conference Final broadcasters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This grouping does not receive significant coverage and fails WP:LISTN. Information for an individual year is more suited to individual articles like 2012 NBA Playoffs. However, I wouldn't advise merging as the entire list is currently based off discussion forums, which are not reliable. I've also added List of NBA Eastern Conference Final broadcasters to this discussion for the same reasons.—Bagumba (talk) 20:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 20:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not significant enough for a standalone article, it's only the broadcasters for the NBA's semifinals. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. If there were a Western Conference Finals article I might suggest merging. That there isn't is probably telling. At the end of the day, I see this information as miscellany that doesn't really rise to the level of its own article. Rikster2 (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.