Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games2win games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Games2win games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A unreferenced list of unnotable software entries which doesn't have their own wikipedia entry. Clearly a case of WP:NOT. mabdul 21:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unlikely any of this is notable. OSborn^arf_contribs. 01:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable, none of these games have articles or sources to back them up, and it's rather hard to search for sources when so many are such common words/phrases. ("Funny Red Carpet", "Blind Date", "Lover Boy", etc.) Sergecross73 msg me 19:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The nominator has summed it up very well. Colon el Tom 11:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.