Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Central American and Caribbean Age Group Championships records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jujutacular ^talk 19:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Central American and Caribbean Age Group Championships records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The whole sporting age-group is not notable on WP, so why should the records be notable? Night of the Big Wind _talk 21:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HurricaneFan 25 — 00:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The reason that nobody has joined this discussion may well be that the statement, "the whole sporting age-group is not notable on WP", is pretty close to incomprehensible. It seems that the nominator has doubly misunderstood the precedent that individual junior athletes do not have the same presumed notability as athletes in high-level adult competitions. That precedent only applies to articles about athletes, not other articles about athletics, and does not even preclude junior athletes from being regarded notable if they get through the general notability guideline. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep – The nomination states that all articles about a group of topics are entirely non-notable, then states that this article isn't notable due to an opinion about other articles, all while not qualifying the rationale why this particular article should be deleted. No assertion based upon policies or guidelines qualifying the article's deletion has been provided. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.