Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labor Order (Azerbaijan)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. There is no policy behind the keep !votes. Star Mississippi 16:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Labor Order (Azerbaijan)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Labor Order (Azerbaijan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An award created by the Azerbaijan government in 2016 (and per the article only given out until 2019). It's one of countless awards given out by the Azerbaijan government. Thenightaway (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Azerbaijan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• Keep Sounds unreasonable to me to delete the article just because because it's one of the awards established by the Azerbaijani government. The civil and military awards of the republic are, of course, established by them. It's one of the highest decorations in the country — Toghrul R (t) 12:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

• Keep Subject fairly pass GNG. --Surə ^🗯 16:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would like to see one to two more editors contribute.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TLA (talk) 11:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails GNG. Just because an award is from a government does not make it automatically notable. An annoucement that an award has been awarded is obviously doesno't establish notability. Sources in the article and BEFORE fail WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Ping me if independent reliable sources with SIGCOV about the award are found. Keep votes provided no sources showing notability.  // Timothy :: talk  06:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.