Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La-La Land Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 19:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La-La Land Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage; fails WP:NCORP. Look likes advertising. The Banner talk 18:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Mentions on TrekMovie.com [1], which has been generally reliable for Star Trek news, and a piece in Collider [2], plus many other sources in the GNews feed. Oaktree b (talk) 18:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first is a fan site. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete absolutely no coverage in reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment reliable coverage in Hollywood Reporter here [3] and Variety [4], Playbill here: [5] all smallish mentions but they detail the types of music the label publishes. Another brief mention but is an "important publisher" in a book here: [6] and the company has won awards from the IFMCA [7]. Mention in Variety again, [8] Oaktree b (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Product presentations and passing mentions are not the reliable, in-depth, independent source we need. The Banner talk 19:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely non-notable, however i'd also think there may be a case to speedy per WP:CSD#G4 as this article is surely no better than the one that was deleted. I'd hazard a guess it may be worse. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The subject in this article could very well gain enough coverage to establish notability down the road. And it's at least a company doing something so if there is more coverage about the company and not just mentions that they made some limited edition records then it should stay. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 19:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.