Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Storer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. PeaceNT 08:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Storer[edit]
Fails WP:BIO as never having played in a fully professional league. robwingfield «T•C» 10:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 11:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no Football League experience = doesn't satisfy the demands of WP:BIO. Despite past debate, current consensus is that playing in the Conference does not meet WP:BIO ChrisTheDude 11:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if he never played senior football for league clubs. Punkmorten 11:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Harry Donaghey. EliminatorJR Talk 13:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep according to his biography he is a professional football player, and his team links to Conference North. The article needs expansion and references. --Ozgod 14:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conference North is not a professional league - Storer has only played league games at an amateur level according to the article and any other sources I've found. robwingfield «T•C» 14:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Christhedude. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Christhedude; fails BIO.--Kubigula (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO. No record of appearances for Leicester, so has to go. Dave101→talk 15:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, never made a single appearance in a professional league. Period. --Angelo 16:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.