Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Myers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to FPSRussia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Myers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article contains mostly unverifiable claims/bio details as well as unreliable sources and there is the issue notability Duhon (talk) 08:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Whilst most of the sources are unreliable (a Wordpress blog by a "twenty-something wannabe arts journalist"? Seriously?) there are a couple (AdPress and the Seattle Weekly) which just about pass the bar for significant coverage in reliable sources. As such, there's enough here to pass WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yunshui said most of what I believe. Also, FPS Russia is #11 on YouTube with over 2.4 million subscribers and is obviously notable with the adweek and seattle weekly coverage.
- WP:BIGNUMBER, WP:ITSNOTABLE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Name My concern with the article is it's biographical claims about "Kyle Myers", most of the sources simply refer to FPS Russia. The one's that claim to have biographical knowledge of "Kyle Myers" are the flimsiest of reliability. I vote to re-name the Page "FPS Russia" as there is not enough info about "Kyle Myers".Duhon (talk) 09:17, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually "FPSRussia" out numbers "FPS Russia". 117Avenue (talk) 05:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re-Name I agree. Rename the page, but don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.3.73.88 (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.