Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwahu Easter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kwahu Easter[edit]

Kwahu Easter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable festival. Declined speedy deletion. I don't think this topic is natable: the two sources (one of which was cited as establishing enough notability to deline the speedy) both look thin to me. There's hardly enough to merge anywhere.TheLongTone (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It appears this AFD was not formatted properly or added to the daily log. Although it is now ten days old, I am adding it to today's log. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 18:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:GNG, looks a very notable event in Ghana, examples of additional coverage include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The Alfred E. A. Asiamah's book The mass factor in rural politics refers to Kwahu Easter as "a catalyst for social development" in the region. Also, both the current sources look valid significant secondary coverage. Cavarrone 08:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.