Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kushky Yar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kushky Yar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
On a Guantanamo prisoner with no coverage at all. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP1E. Tagged for Notability since Feb 2011. The Citations used are primary sources (Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#Reliability_of_US_military_summary_reports). DBigXray 23:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. I couldn't find anything but primary sources and Wikipedia mirrors about this person when I Googled him. Nick-D (talk) 01:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator's reasons. --Artene50 (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP: BIO. Also, it fails WP: GNG, as the coverage listed from the NY Times is only trivial. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Given that the sources are primary, the article fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BLPPRIMARY as it has not been discussed by a secondary source. Zangar (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Nom covers it all. --Tgeairn (talk) 02:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO/GNG. Not that this vote will change the consensus. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 10:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.