Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen E. Broady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that WP:ACADEMIC is not met Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kristen E. Broady

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While accomplished, and this article is well written, most of the references are press releases, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG, the citation count is quite anemic (a high of 6), and there doesn't appear to be any other qualifying points to meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she is the vice-provost of Kentucky State University, and has been an academic at other Historically black colleges and universities. Prior to that she was at Howard University, Dominican University, Fort Valley State University, Atlanta Metropolitan State College. She seems to meet WP:ACADEMIC. This article needs development, not deletion. There is a lot out there to find via a simple Google search. Netherzone (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - exactly how do you feel that she meets WP:ACADEMIC. None of her qualifications meet any of the guidelines under that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In American universities only the president or similar top academic offier is default notable for that position. A few universities probably have enough influence that we could find enough sourcing on any Provost to show they are notable. This would probably apply to say Bruce C. Hafen, the only Provost BYU ever had (at others times the university has had an academic vice president). However Hafen passes notability in several other ways (says the person who created the article on Hafen and then saw it nearly deleted, it was my second article and I had not yet begun to cite.) However later examples like James Rasband and C. Shane Reese do not pass because they were academic vice president, or even because they were deans of specific colleges, although both maybe should lead to passes, but because they held named academic chairs. Reese also might pass another aademically notability criteria because he is a fellow of the American Statistical Association. However vice provosts are just plain not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.