Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraft, Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kraft, Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Entire article dedicated to his ancestry except for short unsourced blurb on his house. Google search returns genealogy sites, wiki mirrors, and Walmart ("Free 2-day shipping. Buy Kraft, Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg at Walmart.com"). JoelleJay (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable --Devokewater@ 08:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, This guy fails WP:GNG, and the article in its current state fails WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly notable: "titular Fürst von Hohenlohe-Langenburg". Oleryhlolsson (talk) 16:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oleryhlolsson, what references are you using to support he is "highly notable"? Or even that he is the "titular Fürst von Hohenlohe-Langenburg"? JoelleJay (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fairly minor "prince". It has been 200+ years since his ancestors actually ruled anything. The article doesn't contain any individual claim for personal notability, just genealogical information. —Kusma (t·c) 19:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, he wasn't a prince, total fantasy, no indication of notability.Smeat75 (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article is nothing more than a genealogical record plus a bit of trivia. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY // Timothy :: talk 01:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This title was abolished 129 years before his birth. This is the most extreme example of someone not notable for a title I have seen in a while. This is an example of dragging content kicking and screaming into the 21st century, in this case a title so long dead that not even the Council of Vienna was able to revive it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.