Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kings Music[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is on a non notable music label who haven’t been discussed or covered in reliable sources. A before search shows me user-generated and self published sources such as this, this, this & this thus aren't to be considered reliable since they are all primary sources. Furthermore, the article creator has move warred over this thus bringing it to AFD would be the only viable method to bring this disruption to a halt Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have searched for sources myself using the Swahili Wikipedia article as guidance and not found the depth of sourcing required to satisfy WP:NCORP or even WP:GNG, which is an easier standard to meet. I also see no evidence of any significance or importance so this does not pass WP:NMUSIC either; it is not one of the more important record labels. A redirect to Ali Kiba may be the best solution for now, however, I am aware that the creator will likely revert such a change. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cannot find anything beyond the self-produced social media promotions located by the nominator and previous voter. No significant and reliable coverage to meet the requirements of WP:NCOMPANY. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article with no sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's shameful how Wikipedia is full of all these unnotable record labels. I used to wonder about how so many unnotable bands manage to stay here for WAAAY too long (and I still do, actually), but record labels are the new contenders. I had no idea Wp is filled with all of these non-notable labels. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.