Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of North Sudan (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kingdom of North Sudan[edit]

The result was ‎ redirect per WP:BOLD revert by Beyond My Ken. (non-admin closure) JMWt (talk) 16:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of North Sudan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unencyclopedic content, no references, no claims to notability on the page. Previously a redirect. JMWt (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete - The nominator nails it: not a single reference. In fact, I'm gong to restore it to a redirect, as WP:V is quite clear that unreferenced material can be removed at any time. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those wishing to see the article version that was nominated should go here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok this is a simple solution which I should have thought of. Maybe I should withdraw the AfD? JMWt (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This is unopposed, and no one opposed a deletion the previous AfD attempt as well. Feel free to close it as redirect - my stance would have been to redirect as well like it was before. Karnataka talk 16:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.