Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Felix (musical group)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- King Felix (musical group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable group, most releases appear to be online only, little third party coverage. Earlier version speedied during AFD: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Felix. Hairhorn (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
King Felix on nme (music news website)
[1]
King Felix official music video with over 300,000 views and comments for a single video.
[2]
Gene93k is believed to be abusing the topic King Felix. Reasoning: multiple source proof of king felix sources moved and ignored by user Gene93k on multiple entries. example published magazine bunker hill reference post of king felix music repeatedly denied by user Gene93k. This leads to reasoning that Gene93k is vandalising/abusing information on this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwoulddawforyou (talk • contribs) — Iwoulddawforyou (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
King Felix in downtown Los angeles new years eve headlining event. [3]v=10151143774430107&set=vb.206548683433&type=3&theater official videos King Felix in bunker hill magazine and flyer for events -[4] [5]
king felix in bunker hill magazine printed magazine release March issue- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=229810457112942&set=a.103976523029670.6443.100002519680841&type=1&theater and original print - [6]
famous artist steve aoiki also in bunker hill magazine. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=407823168433&set=a.440797878433.231693.206548683433&type=3&theater steve aoki also headlined a bunker hill event. [7]
lana del ray cover of march issue King Felix was in, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150613162048434&set=a.442087218433.233908.206548683433&type=1&relevant_count=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retro-ranma (talk • contribs) 13:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC) — Retro-ranma (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
This Goup does hold notability. released tracks on multiple record labels, porcs records, itchy tasty records, and group in union with ascap registration with songs home free, medicinal hookers,
physical albums are out example http://www.amazon.com/01-King-Felix-Touching-Original/dp/B009ZRX4DO http://www.discogs.com/King-Felix-The-Healing-Code/release/4566188 as well as legitimate online retailer beatport.com group also performs regularly in los angles and other areas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.104.73 (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC) — 76.168.104.73 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
most releases appear to be online only, Again This is not true, I have linked physical copies to King Felix's albums on discogs, amazon and more already. and again stated numerous sources on their impact and
interaction with the edm community.
here are more images if need i found in commons http://www.google.com/imgres?start=416&safe=off&biw=1536&bih=794&tbs=sur:f&tbm=isch&tbnid=rCx5rYcF2i2JqM:&imgrefurl=http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KingFelixMusic.png&docid=Z72BVsIcydzsKM&itg=1&imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/KingFelixMusic.png&w=1920&h=1080&ei=QVGyUaqKCsmxiQLetIGQCg&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:44,s:400,i:136&iact=rc&dur=307&page=15&tbnh=168&tbnw=295&ndsp=29&tx=184&ty=67
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/87638311/King%2BFelix%2Bimage.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.last.fm/music/King%2BFelix&h=500&w=500&sz=40&tbnid=i0-wk2xjG5FNLM:&tbnh=96&tbnw=96&zoom=1&usg=__RMlDUB5r8ZRRayc5s9h9aEngKhk=&docid=Ri9m3dnjggd6FM&sa=X&ei=RVKyUbWGLOb_igLFhIDgBg&ved=0CD8Q9QEwBDgK&dur=181— Preceding unsigned comment added by Retro-ranma (talk • contribs)
- Delete The group is only
a yeartwo years old and has not achieved the recognition required for a Wikipedia page. Although the article contains nearly 40 reference citations, none of them are to independent reliable sources, and the attempts by the SPAs to flood this discussion with links and images do not add to the group's notability. Note also that there is a page for King Felix which used to be a redirect to Félix Hernández (a ball player nicknamed King Felix); the creator of this article changed the page King Felix to a dab page, but IMO it should be restored to redirect status and possibly salted, as per the previous AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Felix. --MelanieN (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources are independent of king felix, ie porcs records, Itchy Tasty Records, bunker hill published printed magazine, peace love edm, nme. None of these were posted or created by king felix. also the groups formation was in 2011. King felix is more than a year old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwoulddawforyou (talk • contribs) 09:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Iwoulddawforyou (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Labels connected to the band are obviously not independent parties. The NME page is user-generated content (so does little to establish notability), and links to a performance hosted by a magazine isn't coverage. LIkewise, image searches establish nothing. See WP:BAND for the relevant criteria. Hairhorn (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Flooding an article and an afd with bad sources and pictures does not make a band notable. King Felix lacks any depth of coverage in independent reliable sources. I see nothing that satisfies WP:MUSIC. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
References
[edit]- ^ http://www.nme.com/nme-video/youtube/id/iUWIqy1SmGQ/search/%2Bthe%20members
- ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUWIqy1SmGQ&list=PL8y0KOAy3uQ1dTuY2rlrvvCH7aaoXroIN
- ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hyMVKP22sqc and https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?
- ^ https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150437290703434&set=a.442087218433.233908.206548683433&type=1&relevant_count=1
- ^ https://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/eventReg?oeidk=a07e5fjax7u16b2e28a&oseq
- ^ http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32001110
- ^ https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151144905850107&set=vb.206548683433&type=3&theater
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.