Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Yahya Sinwar

Extended-protected page
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ speedy/snow keep, withdrawn by nominator. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Yahya Sinwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A POV fork that violates WP:BLP by describing as "fact" a presumed death of a living person. If Sinwar was really killed, then a sentence or two would be more enough in his BLP. M.Bitton (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As much as the IDF shouldn't be taken as an RS, almost all (if not all) of their claims of assasinating leaders were always correct Abo Yemen 16:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So there is an agenda behind the suggestion of of deletion not from objective reasons. 2A02:14F:1F5:48DA:31B7:D9D7:C59A:2323 (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious on what the criterion would be: while the Israeli Government is obviously not an RS, if they were to announce that a DNA match was made -- would this AfD be retracted or would that need to wait a Hamas communiqué? NAADAAN (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep: I agree that the article was made prematurely but Yedioth Ahronoth claimed there was a dental match with the forensic report published on Channel 12. While there's still room for doubt, by law of averages you'd expect he'd be dead especially considering the pictures of Sinwar shown on Channel 12. Perhaps rename to "Alleged killing of Yahya Sinwar" until Hamas releases something announcing his "martyrdom". NAADAAN (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep has already been tentatively confirmed and will be further confirmed in the next few hours. By the end of this discussion, his death will be a fully confirmed fact. Dan the Animator 16:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Even if confirmed, would that justify a dedicated article? M.Bitton (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you not hear yourself right now? How many articles are covering the “unconfirmed” and/or “confirmed” death? Checks Google, easily…100+? The answer is yes. I really suggest withdrawing this AFD before it turns into more of a, forgive my French, a shit-show, than it already is. You are a good editor, but this is not the hill to stand and/or “die” on, if you know what I mean. I was once on this type of hill when the war first broke out (starting one of the longest-running RFC’s in Wikipedia history)…I conceded afterwards. As a long-time editor to another long-time editor, don’t die on this hill when it involves anything “Rushed”. Wait a few days and then look at it again. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 16:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait a few days and then look at it again that's what they say about notability, though that involves years, not days. M.Bitton (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I was about to trout WeatherWriter but I have changed my mind Abo Yemen 17:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The strike that killed Nasrallah and the killing of Haniyeh has an article so... yes -- even more so considering the year-long manhunt that Israel led against Sinwar. NAADAAN (talk) 17:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep TOOSOON to delete. He is confirmed dead through DNA analysis. This AfD is premature, getting ahead of events. There might be a case for merge, but give the article time to develop, -- GreenC 17:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.