User talk:Oleg Yunakov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Oleg Yunakov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Yulievich Karakis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP Boomer! 23:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Farkhad Dam[edit]

Hello, I saw you recently created the Farkhad Dam article. I was curious if you had a reference that you could cite the article with. Right now it doesn't have one. --NortyNort (Holla) 08:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leonid Mlechin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

Dear Oleg, I was ruled only by thought, that not exists another person with the same name and surname, and for me was strange, why to use the Eastern Slavonic tradition of patronym for identification that only complicate a searching, but I'll try to be more attentive and of course, I'll try to avoid a violation of any rules (only problem, that they are multiplying, and I amn't able to catch them often). Thank you for the remark--Noel baran (talk) 08:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Noel. Yes, I understood that. And I do agree with the point of removing the middle name. However my point was not about the name, but about how to rename pages. When one copies and pastes content from one page to another (1, 2) the history of the page revision is gone. Moreover the initial creator of the page (who wrote most of the information) gets changed to the creator of the redirection (who wrote one line). Hence it's important to ensure that in similar cases we do page move and not just copy and paste. I have already asked to make proper move and admin has solved the issue. Now the history of the page show proper edits from the creation of the page in 2011 and not like it was yesterday when is seemed that the page was "created" six years later. :). So we are all set. And I totally understood that it was unintentional so just pointed it out as a friendly remark to help in the future. And yes, rules keep on multiplying and I also not know all of them. :) Cheers! Thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 13:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prix Versailles[edit]

Hi, thank you for adding your name as a contact for Anti-Spam. I have posted a message about Prix Versailles at ru:Обсуждение участника:Biathlon#Cross Wikipedia promotion and sock puppets for Prix Versailles, but have not had a response yet. I think the only sock puppet on tr Wikipedia was ru:special:contributions/TangoYalin and they only made eight edits. In en and fr Wikipedias we have deleted the Prix Versailles article, but obviously that is a decision for each Wikipedia to make independently.

Please could you respond to my message or pass it on to the correct project? If you have questions or comments you could post them on meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Following up Prix Versailles. TSventon (talk) 08:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TSventon. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Besides that the article was created by an account that had sole interest to write about this topic, I have also verified the content of the article and it currently doesn't seem to meet notability criteria's for the inclusion in ruwp. I have nominated the article for deletion. Thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 15:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, en and fr Wikipedias did not establish notability and therefore deleted their articles on Prix Versailles. Ru Wikipedia is fortunate that there is relatively little PV related content to review. TSventon (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yanin[edit]

Thanks for reaching out. I removed the references from the lead but feel they do belong in the article. Feel free to add them to the body. I’ll mark it as patrolled after that. Thanks for your contribution to the Wikipedia! NiklausGerard (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, NiklausGerard! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 22:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article "Use of white phosphorus bombs in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine"[edit]

I did the patrol review of this article. Overall, the article is well written, but there are a couple of places where you have ambiguous attributions that you might want to make more specific. For example one paragraph begins "In mid-May, the Ukrainian side accused Russian forces...". I think "the Ukrainian side" is ambiguous. I have marked the attributions that you might want to modify with the[who?] tag.PopePompus (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PopePompus! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 01:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For Roman_Vladimirovich_Kutuzov. Thank you so much.

Twitter is reporting that General Lieutenant Roman Berdnikov has also been killed, reported as Commander 29th Combined Arms Army. Not sure if it's the Roman Berdnikov you made the article for - haven't read your article. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Buckshot06! Yes, that's the one! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 22:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach[edit]

Hi, I have another Anti-Spam query. I have posted a message about a museum in Poland, whose article has been translated into 18 Wikiprojects by a single editor, at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach. The Russian article is ru:Музей профессионального миниатюрного искусства Генрик Ян Доминяк. en and nl Wikipedias have deleted the museum's article as non-notable, but obviously that is a decision for each Wikipedia to make independently. Would you be interested in taking a look?

Coincidentally, I also noticed that ru:Премия Версаля was recreated by a single purpose account on 11 March 2022. TSventon (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TSventon. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the museum article since it's a machine translation and spam. I have also deleted Премия Версаля and put admin protection for recreation for both old name (Версальская премия) and the new one. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 12:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov

Thank you for creating Serhiivka missile strike.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shelling of a nursing home in Kreminna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Vinnitsa bombing[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Vinnitsa bombing. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Missile attack on Vinnytsia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Missile attack on Vinnytsia. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 11:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, in such case I'd suggest to better put #REDIRECT [[Missile attack on Vinnytsia]]. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 11:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thalita do Valle for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thalita do Valle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalita do Valle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mooonswimmer 16:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Oleg Yunakov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shelling of a nursing home in Kreminna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Я в Википедии впервые, и прошу Вас как администратора отпатрулировать текущую версию данной статьи. Я пишу сюда, потому что в русской Википедии кто-то воспользовался моим диапазоном IP-адресов для вандализма, и диапазон заблокирован. 2403:6200:8871:E966:9573:A2B1:234F:69EF (talk) 17:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте!  Done. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 14:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature and linter errors[edit]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:Oleg Yunakov|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;">Oleg Y.</span>]] ([[User talk:Oleg Yunakov|talk]]). ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See WP:SIGFONT for more info.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Прошу Вас удалить данную статью, так как всё её содержимое скопировано из источника, защищённого авторским правом, без каких бы то ни было изменений. 2403:6200:8871:5B22:200B:9C30:829D:C172 (talk) 05:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. В статье , созданной в 2014 году ныне на каждый фрагмент я вижу источники. Приведите источник чьи права по Вашему были нарушены и фрагменты, которые Вы считаете, что были скопированы. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shelling of a nursing home in Kreminna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine is not a part of the USSR anymore and the russian language has no official status in Ukraine at the moment[edit]

Are you a Sovak? Stop russifying Ukrainian street names please. Ukraine is not a russian colony and should not be treated like it is. Ukraine is not a part of the USSR anymore and the russian language has no official status in Ukraine at the moment. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content of this article was translated from my original article written in Russian in ruwiki. I do agree that street names should be written with Ukrainian naming. You changed the name and it's great. I did not change it back. Saying "Stop russifying" when no one was changing it after the initial name in the original article is not the right representation of the situation. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this. I used to be a volunteer at a few schools in Dnipro years ago... So I am not in a stable state of mind today. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that we did not have a difference in opinions all along... Sorry about my abrasive behaviour. Like I said, I am not in a stable state of mind today. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. I understand. My yesterdays edit can show how I feel myself... (And if you will check the source code before yesterday's edit it will show my opinion on this situation). With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding and I sympathise with your ideas. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Блокировка аккаунта в русской Википедии[edit]

@Oleg Yunakov Здравствуйте. Обращаюсь здесь, поскольку в русской Википедии все возможности связи перекрыты. Аккаунт VSL был без конкретных претензий, без предупреждения и возможности возразить бессрочно заблокирован после того, что можно назвать войной правок (два отката за сутки), начатой, однако, другим участником, неоправданно удалившим внесённый в страницу вклад. Аккаунт не является «консервой», хотя это, собственно, и не причина для блокировки. Могли бы вы помочь в разблокировке (снять блокировку самостоятельно или написать запрос к администраторам, сославшись на эти пояснения)?

Решение о блокировке: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия:Запросы_к_администраторам#c-Bechamel-20230516141300-Война_правок_участника_VSL_на_странице_По_сбо

Конфликтная страница: https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Википедия:Аргументация_за_варианты_«в_Украине»_и_«на_Украине»&action=history

Пояснение: данные правки аккаунта VSL не нарушают правил Википедии; конкретных и существенных возражений к последним правкам не было высказано; нигде не установлено, что каждый пункт правок должен предварительно проходить через страницу обсуждения и получать поддержку других участников (конфликтная страница не имеет такого консенсусного правила), хотя к обсуждению эти изменения предлагались. VSL (talk) 16:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I looked at your contribution and, alas, I fully agree with both the wording and the action. What exactly is the reason for ban can be clearly seen here. Even in case that I would have not agreed with the ban, due to the WP:WHEEL rule, I wouldn't be able to undo it either... I am sorry about it. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you, in recognition of your contributions![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hello!

I have taken a look at your contributions to this site, and I found you have made more than 300 edits in the past year-and-a-half regarding politics, particularly the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. I would like to give you this barnstar, to congratulate you for your contributions.

I, in particular, would like to thank you for creating the article "Masha Moskalyova case", because I, too, am interested in that incident. In fact, I have recently made a YouTube video, titled Masha's Adventures in a Legal Wonderland; or, how a Drawing Jailed a Man, about this same case.

Thanks again, Oleg Yunakov!

С глубоким уважением, SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SleepTrain456. Many thanks for the kind words! I am glad that you found the information to be useful as well as took time to mention about it. A separate thanks fo the video. It's important to spread the real information. To be honest my contribution in enwiki is just about 0.1% of what I have created in ruwiki where I have started over 300 pages just about the war in Ukraine (including Вторжение России на Украину, Символы российского вторжения на Украину, Ракетный удар по торговому центру в Кременчуге, Ракетный удар по вокзалу Краматорска, Мятеж ЧВК «Вагнер» and etc.) and made thousands of edits. Since Russia has banned all of the normal news channels Ruwiki is one of the only still remaining source of truth that provide info on what happens and most people there speak only Russian language... All the best! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk)


Your accomplishments here are 0.1% of what you've done? I didn't know that! Also, I'm honored to be talking to the man that created the Russian Wikipedia pages on two major events in current history: the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Вторжение России на Украину) and the Wagner Group rebellion (Мятеж ЧВК «Вагнер»)! Thank you for your contributions to Russian Wikipedia as well!

Also, I'm glad you liked my video! I even have a sequel coming up. For now, you're welcome.

Yours sincerely,

--SleepTrain456 (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's a team work, I have started those articles and then was active contributor. :) P.S. Due to the fact that the Russian authorities throw people in jail foe expressing their thoughts, when I was in Arbcom, we decided to hide history of edits on the articles related to the war. Hence it's not possible to currently see it for non-admins. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Honorary citizens has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Honorary citizens has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Honorary members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People by rank indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re'Im Music Festival Source[edit]

Please add this source to the Re'im Music Festival Massacre, since you're the only one not buying into the anti-Israel propaganda here.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israel-police-slams-haaretz-claim-idf-helicopter-may-have-harmed-civilians-on-oct-7/

A great source calling out the Haaretz article for taking information spread out of contact on social media and reporting it as misinformation. This is the original article out of which the video used in these accusations came, which deliberately states the helicopter was attacking targets in Gaza: https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt

Please mention how this is a misinformation campaign on social media and add it to the Disinformation the in Israel Hamas War article, you pointed earlier

I'd do it myself, but the Wikipedia censors aren't letting me due to article "protection" 2601:40:C481:A940:BC42:C2A9:7FF1:40AF (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, this first link was already added to the article after I have pointed out about it yesterday. In that conversation I have also mentioned about the fake news content from the second link about helicopters. I have created a detailed article on those events (you may use Google translate) and I read reports with the time when helicopters really came. In addition, I have also mentioned about third link (this one) which will eventually be added. Thanks! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't like the way it's worded in the article. It's completely ignoring the fact that that video that is being questioned was literally recording in Gaza. The article mentions the helicopter, but not the fact that it was in Gaza. That's the part that needs to be remedied using the Ynet link. As it stands now, it is still regurgitating misinformation.
Can we just remove the whole thing? Like it's not that notable, and the laymen don't know what actually happened. Hell for all we know the whole thing is a hoax. It's really pissing me off that the editors are pushing for fake news like this, and they literally locked the article, specifically targeting me, because the facts I'm presenting to them don't fit their narrative.
Shame on everyone else involved in this! 69.249.102.223 (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned exactly the same opinion. You might want to comment here on it. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 19:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-woman Israeli tank crew fight (2023) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-woman Israeli tank crew fight (2023) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Makeandtoss (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inbal Rabin-Lieberman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inbal Rabin-Lieberman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbal Rabin-Lieberman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aner Shapira[edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov,

Thank you for creating Aner Shapira.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm not sure that this can stand alone as a biography, but perhaps it could be kept as the Death of Aner Shapira?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Smasongarrison}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mason (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mason. Thank you. Yes, it may be renamed to Death of Aner Shapira. Regarding notability, in addition to murals, his songs are being released even after his death (and already got positive reviews), he got poems created for his heroic acts and etc. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article you might be interested in[edit]

Hi, I just created a Draft:List of Conflicts in the Land of Israel. There exist similar articles for a List of Conflicts in the Near East and a List of Conflicts in Egypt. I think it deserves to be approved, but there will likely be those who don't want the article to be approved. If you think it should be approved, please voice your input! Have a great day! IshChasidecha (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for the FYI. Where may I vote? With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Oleg Yunakov. Thank you for your work on Atzmona attack. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you North8000! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed move against consensus[edit]

Please don't do what you did at the embassy bombing page again - moving a page without discussion, and in fact here in direct contradiction of the recently established consensus in a move discussion. This is highly disruptive, and disruption in a contentious topic area is sanctionable. If you are not already aware of the WP:ARBPIA contentious topic area and its sanctions, please familiarise yourself. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was a discussion. And there was no objection to the name. And I have shown you about such discussion. So please revert your action as allegations should not be stated as fact in the articles name. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The name was confirmed by WP:RM, which is a community consensus process. You can only overturn a community decision on a page with a fresh community consensus, not by an informal local discussion. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Me and other colleagues have shown in several sections on the talk page as well as in the comment that the current name two serious issues. It's consulate and not embassy as well as we should not add unproven allegations as part of the name. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The RM is on the talk page. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I already saw and commented there. We can go a longer way to change obvious mistakes in current title. But the issues should be fixed. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]