Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidd (Australian rapper)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 19:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kidd (Australian rapper)[edit]

Kidd (Australian rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find no evidence of notability nor are there really references on this page. Because of the links that are present I chose not to WP:BLPPROD. Note that this is an Australian rapper which is different than Kidd (Danish rapper) Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, he wanted to list the Australian rapper whose article was originally at the above page before you and Ansh666 started putting in redirects. I agree the Australian rapper should probably be a speedy close as an unsourced and likely autobiography of a non-notable person, but it's a bit difficult for other editors to make a decision if the AfD link now goes to a redirect. Richard3120 (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I actually undid the redirect but the Afd link was to an old one that was closed so I restored. I see now an editor has fixed the Afd link. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete even Speedy delete. I cannot readily see anything that comes close to anywhere near sufficient IRS for WP:NEXIST to support WP:GNG. Also completely unsourced BLP at this time. (Editors need to stop messing procedurally with the article until this AfD runs its course too.) The article has been created by an SPA, and it would seem which has some knowledge of WP (so why no references at all?). Possible alternative and-or COI account? Aoziwe (talk) 02:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PS See also User talk:Gbabeux and contributions for Gbabeux. Aoziwe (talk) 02:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another option. Perhaps move back to DRAFT and let the editor fix it up if it can be referenced appropriately? Aoziwe (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.