Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keystone Derby Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 06:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keystone Derby Cup[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:NRIVALRY due to a lack of independent coverage. A self-published book was published about the cup but that does not contribute to notability [[1]]. Let'srun (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Pennsylvania. Let'srun (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Floored nomination, this article is about a Cup, not a rivalry. If nominator wants to address the notability that's a different question. However, due to lacklustre nomination, I had a look at the article, but I shall say a rather weak keep, I could easily go the other way for delete, but there was enough citations and a tiny bit more online to suggest some notability, however mine is a very weak keep. Govvy (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete rather than being pedantic on whether it's a rivalry or a cup series between 2 teams, we should instead be focusing on WP:GNG, which this cup does not meet. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.