Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsang Dhondup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tibetan National Football Association. Seems clear consensus is to redirect, but some confusion over to where. I'm going to be bold here and plump for the TNFA, as that, according to the articles is where he now works, plus he is actually mentioned in the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kelsang Dhondup[edit]

Kelsang Dhondup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played or managed in a FPL or senior international match. Tibet isn't a nation and isn't recognised by FIFA. Dhondup fails GNG also. Dougal18 (talk) 08:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dougal18 (talk) 08:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect' but to Tibetan National Football Association instead. GiantSnowman 10:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to either of the two targets above, without prejudice on article recreation if better sources are found. SportingFlyer T·C 18:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - per above. Inter&anthro (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I don't get the redirect suggestion, Levivich has shown enough sourcing to pass a basic WP:GNG article, this whole AfD is a joke. Levi why don't you improve some articles then instead of wanting to delete them all. Govvy (talk) 10:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There's two different targets for a redirect mentioned and right now redirect seems to be the consensus. Relisting to hopefully establish consensus for the target redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.