Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelah Kay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelah Kay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Didn't pass at AfC and was manually moved to mainspace by it's creator. Don't see how it passes WP:NMUSIC or WP:ANYBIO. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm getting absolutely zero results when searching for this name (aside from Spotify, Apple Music, etc.). I know as a foreign artist, there may be some non-English or local print media about him, but until that's proven to exist, he is simply non-notable. Why? I Ask (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article subject has no single reliable source which fails WP:GNG. Secondly from the contribution of the editor who created this article, he or she is here to write and promote people from Port Harcourt that are not notable. It is suspicious that the creator of the article has a close connection to this port harcourt people he or she is writing about.--Gabriel^t@lk 21:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well you know how painful it is to see the article you struggled and researched for being pulled down after days of researches and conclusions and committing to Wikipedia.

i understand you are a well respected person on Wikipedia but that doesn't mean you'll use your power to oppress others that haven't reached your stage in this wikipedia, well table turns

its your turn today doesn't mean it will be for ever. Thanks for nominating the page for deletion after so many research Phwriter20 (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The subject of the article is non-notable and does not meet WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, or WP:NMUSIC. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, doesn't meet any notability standard. --Muhandes (talk) 08:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There just isn't WP:SIGCOV in WP:SECONDARY WP:RS. Jacona (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — per nom. R E A D I N G ^{Talk to the Beans?} 13:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — When the article's creator compares a call for reliable evidence to oppression, you know the forecast for notability doesn't look good. The musician is just getting started and he managed to put a few songs on self-upload services and copied a biography into a few directories. Anyone can do that. Good luck to him but for now, let's be charitable with too soon. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject is non-notable and the article's creator was blocked for threats and personal attacks. Partofthemachine (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.