Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kearny Arlington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kearny Arlington

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can barely find evidence of the teams existence and certainly not enough to pass NORG. The American Cup that they won is stated in the article to be different from the notable American Cup. It just doesn't seem the team was particularly notable. TartarTorte 03:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 03:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 03:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative Delete - Two sources provided. One is an archive of what appears to be a fan-run website without an editorial process. The other is an article from the New York Times, which, if it contained the information in question, would be a clear indication of notability. The trouble I have is that I clicked the PDF linked in the article, and nothing I see there mentions soccer in any way... the PDF talks about golf, yachting, polo, track and field, baseball, and a racist crime report, but no soccer (or association football) that I can see. Now, this PDF is only a clipping from the newspaper, and its entirely possible that the newpaper did talk about this soccer team on that day, and it's just not in the PDF... but there's nothing here as far as I can see. This !vote will change to keep if a valid source is found. Fieari (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nominator. Even with the NYT article, doesn't seem like enough to pass WP:GNG. Spf121188 (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - @GiantSnowman:, your comment seems to have been deleted before it was submitted Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, IT issues, fixed. Giant Snowman 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Absolutely not notability here. There are no sources and the ones (only two in total) in the reference list cannot be used to retain this article on WP. Glucken123 (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. TartarTorte 21:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.