Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Spade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. Obviously meets WP:GNG and will not be deleted. Concerns about material in the article should be discussed on the talk page. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Spade[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Troubled fashion founder that committed suicide. 64.18.11.66 (talk) 13:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article has many reliable sources. 208.125.9.178 (talk) 13:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- very clearly notable, with plenty of references already. JesseW, the juggling janitor 13:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Fashion, and Missouri. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. No reason to delete given and subject clearly notable. Skynxnex (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - well referenced article, passes WP:BIO and WP:GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Nominator does not make a serious argument for deletion. Article easily passes BIO and GNG. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is a second page for this AfD here for some reason. The AfD notice on the Kate Spade page goes to "Wikipedia talk:Articles for Deletion/Kate Spade" which redirects back here, but that page is still there if you ignore the redirect per that link. This whole AfD seems a little unusual to me, even aside from Spade easily passing Wikipedia notability guidelines that the nominator seems to have not considered. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. KS might be a household name for some shoppers, but not everyone knows who she is. 67.254.131.226 (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a good deletion reason. Please read WP:AADD. And please stop trying to redirect this AfD discussion. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article and fix it but Delete any original research from the article. 12.190.178.37 (talk) 18:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.