Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashif Ali Abbas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Ali Abbas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not clear how this person is notable. Includes links to a number of websites which Wikipedia blocks because of a history of spam. RadioFan (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doubtless this is a vanity page. The author's "accomplishments" amount to writing for some open web sites (i.e. sites that accept all writings). The "recent accomplishments" section lists a number of honors that are meaningful perhaps only to other members of the sites he writes for. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment forgot to mention, it's an autobiography.--RadioFan (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, although the poet's lines on Keats —

Jazzed up and admirable was he amidst other great poets
Omnipotent wild lines were his eternal poetic trademark
Heartbroken by Fanny, TB weakened my great hero

are deliciously reminiscent of some still entertaining writing by F. Anstey. I'd say this probably qualifies for speedy deletion, though.- Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete self-advertisment for a non-notable person. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Nom. Seems to me to fail WP:NOTE. ^Avicenna_sis @ 06:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.