Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KarmaCircles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards future demonstrations of notability. Kurykh (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KarmaCircles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relatively new website with no indication of notability. Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Doesn't meet GNG at this time. It might at some point in the future, there are some reliable external sources. Just not enough yet to establish notability. South Nashua (talk) 03:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have some more resources to add up to meet GNG which I am gong to add now. Bulle Shah (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Simply appending bare URL links to the bottom of the page doesn't go very far toward establishing notability. More comments needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources and detailed in press releases. Meatsgains (talk) 02:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as WP:TOOSOON. It looks like it might be notable pretty soon, but not yet. Decent coverage in BWDisrupt, but everything else I could access (a links didn't work) looked like press release, interview, primary source, or trivial mention. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment will be developing as I have more resources at hand now. Please consider a bit of time frame. It would be inappropriate to say links are a "passing mention" because a national daily like Times of India has written a whole dedicated article on it. Plus most resources talk about the company except one that talks about the founder.Bulle Shah (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.