Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karin Elisabeth von Schaper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karin Elisabeth von Schaper

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This might be the most obvious genealogical entry I have encountered. Half the article is about descent from early modern and medieval families. There is no indication of significant coverage outside genealogy publications; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. The topic evidently fails WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Surtsicna (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG --Devokewater@ 14:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete members by marriage in deposed royal families are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comments above, fails WP:GNG.Smeat75 (talk) 00:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per - not notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families.
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to that of her husband, Friedrich Franz, Hereditary Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin. Bearian (talk) 23:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.