Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamalika Chanda (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G4) by Iridescent. (non-admin closure) Anup [Talk] 10:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kamalika Chanda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, article's sources barely mention her at all. I also doubt she has suddenly become notable in the month since the previous AfD discussion. Yintan 12:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Yintan:: Since the article has been re-created so soon after the last AfD, it might be eligible for speedy deletion per WP:G4 if it is bascially the same as the version that deleted. Re-created articles really only require a new AfD when they differ substantially from previous deleted versions. Having said that, another option to deletion might be to suggest userfication to the article's creator. That way the creator can (if they want to) continue to work on a draft version of the article and search for better sources. The draft can then be submitted via WP:AFC once it's ready for review. If the AfC reviewers will provide comments on things that need to be improve and will only approve the draft if they feel its ready for the article namespace. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi. I can't see the deleted version so I can't compare the two. As far as the creator goes, he appears to be determined to recreate again and again. [1],[2] Yintan 06:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is basically the same as before and just keeps being recreated after it is deleted, then you could ask for the tile to be salted. FWIW, I asked the admin who deleted the first time around at User talk:MBisanz#Kamalika Chanda whether this version qualifies for speedy deletion, but haven't received a response yet. You can try asking for assistance at WP:AN if you want, explaining what the creator has said about recreating the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion concluded: Keep the article: Added several sources, and established notability. Keep the Article Kamalika Chanda.Riisen (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Riisen: AfD does not work that way. You may continue to work on the article and improve it by adding sources and content, but the discussion remains open until an administrator reviews it to determine whether a consensus has been reached on what should be done about the article. Since you're new to Wikipedia, you probably should read WP:AFD#Contributing to AfD discussions and familiarize yourself with how an AfD works. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I told you, I have re created the article, you dont teach me wikipedia, with new sources, new content, new references, and notable filmography. now will you stop reverting my edits in this page again, could you please do that, could you could you please stop reverting my edits on this page. pleaseRiisen (talk) 09:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted by reply at User talk:Marchjuly#STOP for reference, but just want to add that you should try to be careful not edit the talk page posts of other editors like you did to mine here. Accidents like this may happen, but others might feel it's being done on purpose if accidents start to happen too many times. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Riisen: And you can stop the accusations of racism and other personal attacks too. Thanks. Yintan 09:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Riisen: Be civil. Do not make baseless accusations. Who is that "someone" that prevents or prevented you from participating in this discussion? Last one, how is "you" related to subject of the article? Anup [Talk] 08:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm going to G4 it. Anup [Talk] 08:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Yintan 09:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.