Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kader Bidimbou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfied. Article is now at User:Finnegas/Kader Bidimbou Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kader Bidimbou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator, no reason given. This player fails both WP:GNG (due to lack of significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (has not played in a fully-professional league or at senior international level). Giant Snowman 13:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy Talented youngster signed by one of Africa's leading clubs will pass notability guidelines once he makes an appearance. Could the article be Userfied I would be more than willing to re create once the subject is notable. Finnegas (talk) 12:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see much reason to userfy a stub, it can be easily created once / if he makes an FPL appearance. Fenix down (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.