Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin de Deney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Justin de Deney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was not able to confirm that this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. The cited sources don't verify notability, and I couldn't find better sources with my own search. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He's running yet another website giving shopping advice with links to a retailer (yawn). He'll photograph your wedding for a reasonable fee; nothing wrong with that. And I do like this series; unfortunately others don't seem to have noticed it. The little article on him is modest and informative; I hope somebody can dig up some sourcery. -- Hoary (talk) 00:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The New Sporting Britain link appears to be yet another of Justin's web pages and not a show. This article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Dethlock99 (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:50, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some of the article appears to be original research. The two citations are merely to photographs by Justin de Deney. The external links consist of a photograph by Justin de Deney, a homepage, an office page and an advice "blog". There are no secondary sources. In newspapers and magazines all I found were photographs credited to Justin De Deney, there was no coverage of the person. --Bejnar (talk) 07:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I have looked far and wide for some references for the notability for his photography. He has had one exhibition and shoots for some magazines, but I can find nothing that independently reports on his notability although I feel there might be something out there one day. Jenafalt (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.