Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Plautz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Editors who supported Keeping this article should read up on what RS are as well as the in depth coverage required for SIGCOV. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Plautz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The notability guidelines are always interpreted differently. This article is definitely not a clear candidate for deletion. There is not a tiny attempt of improvement; deletion seems to be the easiest way to handle imperfect articles for some users. The easiest way is not always the best or most reasonable way, though. --Mojnsen (talk) 15:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is definitely not a clear candidate for deletion. Why? Please provide a policy-based reasoning. I searched for WP:SIGCOV and couldn't find any. Could you? Robby.is.on (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Mojnsen. Puppygray (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The sources provided are reliable, significant coverage in form of statistics exists, secondary sources are used, and the football player played for professional football clubs in Denmark and Germany. --Mojnsen (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics databases are not significant coverage. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A added a source Puppygray (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added the player's profile at footballtransfers.com which is also a statistics database and also not SIGCOV. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails SPORTSBASIC and GNG. Only sources found were databases and statistics pages, which isn't SIGCOV as noted above. Tails Wx 21:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.