Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior World Series of Indoor Cricket
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Junior World Series of Indoor Cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article survived an AfD in 2010, but since then WP:GNG has not further been established, and the article is unreferenced. A quick search reveals little coverage and nothing in depth. Fails WP:OFFCRIC and WP:GNG. AA (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. AA (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG, so we don't need the article. Just because it sort of survived an AFD in 2010 (it seems to have been removed from the AFD), that isn't a reason to keep. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. A search for sources yields no in depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 10:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.