Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicy ML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy ML

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Covert UPE article on a non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO and lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a colossal WP:GNG fail . A replica draft under a different name exists in article creator’s Draftspace as Draft:Arlik Wire. Celestina007 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — First they say they weren’t paid to create the article then they confirm that they were indeed paid to create the article. Then they proceed to what I’d best describe as troll me(by copy-pasting a response from a different editor & including this to his statements in my tp) & this is all coming from the article creator who claims (in their Userpage) to have been a Sysop in their previous account but lost the password to that account. Celestina007 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete yet another in a long line of vanity spam drafts-cum-articles with 0 coverage in independent reliable sources. CUPIDICAE💕 01:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet GNG with RS. --Kbabej (talk) 03:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. fails WP:MUSICBIO. DoctorsHub (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockstrike. Blablubbs|talk 20:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - light years away from meeting GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. (Not sure what "drafts-cum-articles" are though...) GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 04:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW; may meet CSD A7, G11. Clearly fails GNG & WP:MUSICBIO. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 22:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.