Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wilson McCracken (artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
John Wilson McCracken (artist)[edit]
- John Wilson McCracken (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indications of notability. Only scant references to this individual to be found on the web: a description of his art on loan to the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and several duplicated announcements of an exhibition of his art displayed at the art museum at which he worked. (See this one for example. None of the available references verify the details in this article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no real coverage. [1]. LibStar (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem encyclopedic or notable...Modernist (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Lack of sources or claim to significance. JNW (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.